Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Corsair CMD32GX4M2A2800C16 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs Corsair CMD32GX4M2A2800C16 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMD32GX4M2A2800C16 16GB

Corsair CMD32GX4M2A2800C16 16GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    16.9 left arrow 15.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    12.0 left arrow 10.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.13% higher bandwidth
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 29
    Around -12% lower latency

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Corsair CMD32GX4M2A2800C16 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 26
  • Read speed, GB/s
    16.9 left arrow 15.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.0 left arrow 10.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2601 left arrow 3011
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons