Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 36
    Around 19% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    20 left arrow 13.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    15.9 left arrow 9.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 19200
    Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 36
  • Read speed, GB/s
    20.0 left arrow 13.6
  • Write speed, GB/s
    15.9 left arrow 9.9
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • Timings / Clock speed
    17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3713 left arrow 2360
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons