RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 30

Around -25% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Crucial Technology 16G4UD2400.C16BD1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3550 2654

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns