RAM comparison Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB vs Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 8GB

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB vs Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 38

Around -23% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.6 13.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.9 8.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 10600

Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Kingston 99U5624-003.A00G 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 8 9 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2106 2320

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns