RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Menu
RAMs
RAM
DDR5
DDR4
DDR3
DDR2
About the site
Русский
English
Español
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Polski
中文
日本語
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
Compare
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB vs Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
Overall score
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Overall score
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
Differences
Specifications
Comments
Differences
Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Report a bug
Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
43
73
Around 41% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s
9.3
7.9
Average value in the tests
Reasons to consider
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
Report a bug
Faster reading speed, GB/s
15.1
13.2
Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
19200
12800
Around 1.5 higher bandwidth
Specifications
Complete list of technical specifications
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
Main characteristics
Memory type
DDR3
DDR4
Latency in PassMark, ns
43
73
Read speed, GB/s
13.2
15.1
Write speed, GB/s
9.3
7.9
Memory bandwidth, mbps
12800
19200
Other
Description
PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed
9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
2285
1724
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB RAM comparisons
G Skill Intl F3-1600C11-8GISL 8GB
A-DATA Technology DDR4 4133 8GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB RAM comparisons
TwinMOS 8DHE3MN8-HATP 2GB
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
RAM 2
CAS Latency (CL) *
Frequency (Mhz) *
calculate
Absolute Latency
0 ns
Latest comparisons
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 16GB
Apacer Technology GD2.0927WH.001 8GB
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Shenzhen Xingmem Technology Corp KRE-D4U2400M/4G 4GB
SK Hynix DDR2 800 2G 2GB
Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4RL.M8FE 8GB
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 4GB
SK Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-UH 16GB
Samsung M393B1G70QH0-YK0 8GB
Kingston 9905712-008.A00G 16GB
A-DATA Technology AD73I1C1674EV 4GB
AMD R948G3206U2S 8GB
Kingston HX318C10FK/4 4GB
Crucial Technology BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 8GB
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 8GB
Mushkin MR[A/B]4U320LLLM16G 16GB
Nanya Technology M2Y51264TU88B0B-3C 512MB
Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4BL.M8FE1 8GB
Samsung M3 78T3354BZ0-CCC 256MB
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 8GB
Kingston 9965433-034.A00LF 4GB
Kingston 9905624-018.A00G 8GB
Micron Technology 8ATF2G64HZ-3G2E2 16GB
Kingston HX432C15PB3/16 16GB
Hynix Semiconductor (Hyundai Electronics) HMT42GR7MFR4A
SK Hynix HMA82GU7AFR8N-UH 16GB
Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB
Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4BL.M16FB 32GB
Report a bug
×
Bug description
Source link