RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 38

Around 3% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.5 9.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 12800

Around 1.66% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 8GB

Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2676 2566

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns