RAM comparison Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2GB vs Kingston HX316C10F/8 8GB

Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2GB vs Kingston HX316C10F/8 8GB

Overall score

Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston HX316C10F/8 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

36 38

Around -6% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.7 13.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.2 8.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 2GB

Kingston HX316C10F/8 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1865 2585

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns