RAM comparison Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB vs Corsair CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB vs Corsair CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

23 31

Around 26% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.9 17.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Corsair CMD32GX4M2C3200C16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3241 3542

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns