Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 8GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 8GB

Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    5 left arrow 17.5
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,135.0 left arrow 14.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    28 left arrow 51
    Around -82% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 6400
    Around 3.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Essencore Limited KD48GU880-32A160X 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    51 left arrow 28
  • Read speed, GB/s
    5,021.4 left arrow 17.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,135.0 left arrow 14.1
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    855 left arrow 3627
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons