RAM comparison Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4GB vs Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4GB vs Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Overall score

Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 39

Around 5% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.6 14.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.6 8.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 4GB

Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2409 2340

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns