RAM comparison Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

30 186

Around -520% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.1 3.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.2 2.0

Average value in the tests

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

536 3550

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns