Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSA.M8F 4GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSA.M8F 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSA.M8F 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSA.M8F 4GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    5 left arrow 13.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    27 left arrow 51
    Around -89% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    9.8 left arrow 2,135.0
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 6400
    Around 3 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSA.M8F 4GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    51 left arrow 27
  • Read speed, GB/s
    5,021.4 left arrow 13.6
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,135.0 left arrow 9.8
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    855 left arrow 2403
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons