Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB vs Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB

Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    3 left arrow 18.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    22 left arrow 79
    Around -259% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    12.8 left arrow 1,468.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 6400
    Around 2.66 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB
Corsair CMU32GX4M4C3000C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    79 left arrow 22
  • Read speed, GB/s
    3,061.8 left arrow 18.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    1,468.1 left arrow 12.8
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    422 left arrow 3205
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons