Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 48
    Around 40% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    10.4 left arrow 9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    8.5 left arrow 5.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 10600
    Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 48
  • Read speed, GB/s
    9.0 left arrow 10.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    5.7 left arrow 8.5
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    10600 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    1274 left arrow 1858
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons