Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Kllisre 99P54280002.A00LF 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kllisre 99P54280002.A00LF 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kllisre 99P54280002.A00LF 8GB

Kllisre 99P54280002.A00LF 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 11.2
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    47 left arrow 62
    Around -32% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    8.4 left arrow 2,378.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 6400
    Around 3.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Kllisre 99P54280002.A00LF 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 47
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 11.2
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 8.4
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 2362
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons