Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 2GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 2GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 2GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    62 left arrow 96
    Around 35% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 10.5
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    5.9 left arrow 2,378.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 6400
    Around 3 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB76H8F2400 2GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 96
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 10.5
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 5.9
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 1211
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons