RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB vs Corsair CMU32GX4M4D3000C16 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB vs Corsair CMU32GX4M4D3000C16 8GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMU32GX4M4D3000C16 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

11.1 9.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.8 7.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMR5030MM58E8F1600 2GB

Corsair CMU32GX4M4D3000C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1601 1699

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns