RAM comparison Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M4C3400C16 8GB

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M4C3400C16 8GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

23 25

Around 8% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.9 16

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.3 12.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M4C3400C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 76.D105G.D090B 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M4C3400C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3241 3058

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns