RAM comparison Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8GB

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB vs Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

43 111

Around -158% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.6 1,765.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 6400

Around 2.66 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 78.A1GA0.9L4 2GB

Corsair CMW64GX4M8C3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

461 3050

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns