RAM comparison Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT4G4SFS8266.C8FE 4GB

Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT4G4SFS8266.C8FE 4GB

Overall score

Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 166

Around 84% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.4 8.1

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT4G4SFS8266.C8FE 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.7 13.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 10600

Around 2.01 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Apacer Technology 78.A1GC6.9H10C 2GB

Crucial Technology CT4G4SFS8266.C8FE 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2050 1107

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns