RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FD1 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FD1 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FD1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

25 26

Around -4% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FD1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3705 2702

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns