RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Essencore Limited IM4AGS88N24-FFFHA0 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Essencore Limited IM4AGS88N24-FFFHA0 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Reasons to consider
Essencore Limited IM4AGS88N24-FFFHA0 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

23 26

Around -13% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Essencore Limited IM4AGS88N24-FFFHA0 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3705 3126

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns