RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT102464BD186D 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT102464BD186D 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BD186D 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 29

Around -21% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.9 12.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.4 9.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

14200 12800

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BD186D 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-14200, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz no data
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2282 2864

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns