RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 101

Around 71% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 6.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2282 1369

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns