RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 16GB vs Kingston 9905598-025.A00G 8GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 16GB vs Kingston 9905598-025.A00G 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.4 13.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.0 6.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9905598-025.A00G 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8266.M16FJ 16GB

Kingston 9905598-025.A00G 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3398 2045

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns