Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FG 2GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FG 2GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FG 2GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FG 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 17
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,027.0 left arrow 12.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    30 left arrow 52
    Around -73% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 6400
    Around 2.66 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FG 2GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    52 left arrow 30
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,837.1 left arrow 17.0
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,027.0 left arrow 12.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    794 left arrow 3142
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons