Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FA 16GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FA 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FA 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FA 16GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    5 left arrow 15.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,135.0 left arrow 12.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    25 left arrow 51
    Around -104% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 6400
    Around 3 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT25664AA800.M16FM 2GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD824A.M16FA 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    51 left arrow 25
  • Read speed, GB/s
    5,021.4 left arrow 15.9
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,135.0 left arrow 12.9
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    855 left arrow 2907
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons