RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB vs Kingston 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8GB

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB vs Kingston 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 107

Around 73% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 8.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.1 4.7

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Kingston 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B2 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2227 1022

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns