RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB vs Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 119

Around 76% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.3 1.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.1 2.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 12800

Around 1.66 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT25664BA160B.C16F 2GB

Kingston HP26D4S9D8MJ-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2227 447

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns