RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

62 103

Around 40% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

4 13.9

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Hewlett-Packard 7EH98AA#ABB 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

861 1520

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns