Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 8GB

Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 10.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    38 left arrow 62
    Around -63% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    4.7 left arrow 2,378.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 6400
    Around 3 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Kingston 9905678-173.A00G 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 38
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 10.4
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 4.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 1672
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons