RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kingston 9905704-007.A00G 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Kingston 9905704-007.A00G 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

62 101

Around 39% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

4 14.2

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9905704-007.A00G 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Kingston 9905704-007.A00G 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

861 1399

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns