RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

25 374

Around 93% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.1 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.6 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT51264BD1339.M16F 4GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2045 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns