RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 44

Around 39% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.5 12.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.9 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

14900 12800

Around 1.16% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT8G3S186DM.C16FN 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B.C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-14900, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

9-10-9-28 / 1866 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2525 2193

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns