RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 8GB vs Crucial Technology BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 8GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 8GB vs Crucial Technology BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

34 36

Around 6% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.4 13.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT8G4DFRA32A.C4FE 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAD 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 28 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2881 2690

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns