RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 8GB vs Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 8GB vs Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.7 14.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFRA32A.C16FG 8GB

Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 38
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2096 3319

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns