RAM comparison Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3000 32GB

Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB vs Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3000 32GB

Overall score

Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 31

Around 13% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3000 32GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Hoodisk Electronics Co Ltd GKE160SO102408-2666 16GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited CL16-20-20 D4-3000 32GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2756 3650

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns