RAM comparison Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 16GB vs Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 16GB vs Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Overall score

Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 29

Around 24% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.3 14.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 16000

Around 1.2% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 16GB

Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC5-16000, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz no data
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2960 3521

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns