RAM comparison Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Overall score

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 31

Around -7% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

20 12.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.9 8.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2460 3713

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns