RAM comparison Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB vs Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF 4GB

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB vs Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF 4GB

Overall score

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 27

Around -4% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

13.9 11.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 8.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2GB

Kingston 99U5428-049.A00LF 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1620 2406

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns