Peak Electronics 256X64M-67E 2GB
Kingston X3XCFP-HYA 8GB

Peak Electronics 256X64M-67E 2GB vs Kingston X3XCFP-HYA 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Peak Electronics 256X64M-67E 2GB

Peak Electronics 256X64M-67E 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston X3XCFP-HYA 8GB

Kingston X3XCFP-HYA 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    5 left arrow 17.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    22 left arrow 39
    Around -77% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    13.3 left arrow 1,597.0
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 5300
    Around 3.21 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Peak Electronics 256X64M-67E 2GB
Kingston X3XCFP-HYA 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    39 left arrow 22
  • Read speed, GB/s
    5,022.9 left arrow 17.6
  • Write speed, GB/s
    1,597.0 left arrow 13.3
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    5300 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC2-5300, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 667 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    753 left arrow 3028
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons