Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFDFD4A.M16FH 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFDFD4A.M16FH 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFDFD4A.M16FH 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFDFD4A.M16FH 16GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    13.2 left arrow 11.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    9.3 left arrow 6.0
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    27 left arrow 43
    Around -59% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 12800
    Around 1.5 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Ramaxel Technology RMR5040ED58E9W1600 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFDFD4A.M16FH 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    43 left arrow 27
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.2 left arrow 11.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    9.3 left arrow 6.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2285 left arrow 1901
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons