RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB vs Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

39 101

Around 61% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.4 6.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 4GB

Kingston 99U5711-001.A00G 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1966 1369

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns