RAM comparison Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8GB vs Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8GB vs Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Overall score

Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

21 44

Around -110% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.1 11.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.5 8.1

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

16000 10600

Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 8GB

Corsair MK16GX44B3000C15 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC4-16000, 1.2V, TBD1 V, TBD2 V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz no data
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2293 3435

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns