RAM comparison SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Overall score

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

34 117

Around -244% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 5300

Around 4.02 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

SK Hynix HYMP31GF72CMP4D5Y5 8GB

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC-5300, PS1: 1.5V, PS2: 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

784 3477

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns