RAM comparison Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 16GB

Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.8 13.4

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.7 12.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CM5S16GM4800A40K2 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3436 3734

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns