RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 30

Around -7% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.7 18.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.6 14.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3550 3614

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns