RAM comparison Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M8FB1 16GB

Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M8FB1 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M8FB1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 29

Around -4% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.9 14.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.1 13.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 16000

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 32GB

Crucial Technology BL16G32C16U4RL.M8FB1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-16000, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

no data 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3521 3785

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns