Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FP 16GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FP 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FP 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FP 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 34
    Around 15% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    16.9 left arrow 16.6
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.3 left arrow 12.0
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 19200
    Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 4GB
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FP 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 34
  • Read speed, GB/s
    16.9 left arrow 16.6
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.0 left arrow 14.3
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
  • Timings / Clock speed
    15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2601 left arrow 3282
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons