Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3000C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB vs Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3000C16 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3000C16 8GB

Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3000C16 8GB

Differences

  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.13% higher bandwidth
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    20 left arrow 24
    Around -20% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    19.7 left arrow 15.5
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.9 left arrow 11.0
    Average value in the tests

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB
Corsair CMU16GX4M2D3000C16 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    24 left arrow 20
  • Read speed, GB/s
    15.5 left arrow 19.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    11.0 left arrow 14.9
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2445 left arrow 3400
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons